Showing posts with label Ukraine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ukraine. Show all posts

Sunday, April 20, 2014

The Russian democratic transition victim of the Ukrainian crisis

The Ukrainian crisis serves Putin's geopolitical vision of Russia's neighborhood at the detriment of its economy and economic environment, deterring the long-awaited emergence of the Russian middle class.  The threat of an isolation of the Russian economy combined to its low degree of diversification would lock the Russian middle-class down and do away with hopes of a liberal democratic transition, the best bid at a safe Eastern European neighborhood.     

Civil society in the democratic transition
A healthy civil society is a necessary condition for a transition to a democracy and acts as a check on authority, provides political society and the state apparatus with new members, and fuels economic activity. However, Russian civil society does not fulfill any of the above roles.

The Russian media lacks independence needed to reflect a plurality of opinions in a democratic society: Freedom House reports that “In the 2008 presidential election, state dominance of the media was on full display, debate was absent”.  This trend was in no way reversed as the Russian state’s control of the media deepened with a restructuring of the state media and a purchase of Profmedia by Gazprom, showing further formal control of the media by governmental authorities.

In the democratization process, citizens wielding economic power categorizing them as middle-class yet who are independent from the government are of key importance: they are able to provide a material base for democratic life.  For a country’s middle-class to develop, it is important that its income both grows and spreads rather equally among its citizens.  Russian GDP does show that the first criteria is met (see graph).  However, the increase in revenues has not resulted in the expansion of the middle class nor in the second criterion being met, a more equal spread of revenues: the GINI index, a measure of income inequality, has worsened in Russia (37 in 2004, 40 in 2010, 42 in 2012).  Despite the prosperity of its economy, the existence of a middle class is considered rather uncertain by analysts such as Lilia Ovcharova.  In the early 2000’s, 20% of the Russian population constituted the middle class.


Source: World Economic Outlook 

In 2008, well into the economic boom, the population share was identical although the composition of that middle class was quite different: business people were replaced by bureaucrats who exert considerable influence on the outcome of entrepreneurial activities in the Russian red-taped economy (Ovcharova (2012)).  This is illustrated well with the income in Russia stemming from entrepreneurial activity dropping steadily since a peak in 2000 (see graph with data from Ovchara (2012)).


Source: Lilia Ovchara's Russia’s middle class: at the centre or on the periphery of Russian politics?  European Union’s Institute for Security Studies

Why the middle-class is blocked
A 2013 IMF working paper has demonstrated the importance of the diversification of exports in the avoidance of the middle-income trap.  To put the economic reasoning simply, when many parts of society are contributing to the growth of its economic, more opportunities for technological spillovers from one sector to another are possible and the mobility of both capital and human factors of production is higher.  Not only is it necessary to diversify exports but also moving up the technological ladder is necessary to avoid the middle-income trap.

Nearly 70% of Russian exports in value stem from the energy sector (see graph below for a visual presentation of Russian exports).  The 2008 Economic Complexity Index of its exports is 0,314, which is very low compared to indexes of China and Mexico (0,982 and 1,156).  As such, Russia has neither the diversification nor technological added-value required to put the country on a path of sustained across-the-board development that would warrant the blossoming of a middle class.


Source: The Observatory of Economic Complexity

The high reliance of the Russian economy on the energy sector prevents it from achieving higher and more equal growth that would permit the blossoming of a middle-class essential to a democratic state.  For as long as the oligarchic kleptocracy will thrive on the current petro-dependent state of the economy, the long-awaited democratic transition of Russia shall remain wishful thinking.

How the Ukrainian crisis affects the Russian middle class
As CNN reports, Russian lawmakers drafted a law allowing Russia to confiscate foreign assets in the event that sanctions would be imposed on Moscow.  This climate of uncertainty and risk in the protection of foreign investments, combined with the track record of the arbitrary judiciary system under the control of political powers (e.g. the Shell 2006 Sakhalin-2 project) and risks of armed conflict, is likely to drive away foreign investments which are crucially needed diversify the Russian economy beyond natural ressources and strengthen the middle class.  A weak middle class and an economic dependence on the state-controlled energy sector are exactly what Putin needs to perpetuate the kleptocratic oligarchic political system.

In this context, de-escalation efforts by the United States and the European Union may be the best bid to ensure that a democratic transition will one day occur in Russia.  International economic isolation combined with a further dependence on the petro-industry will set the fragile Russian middle class back. Nervous knee-jerk muscle-flexing might appear as an attractive option in the short run but will set the Western agenda back on the long run: sacrificing the Russian middle class by entering into an economic and military conflict to protect Ukraine is not worth the candle.  Rather, a tense path towards a non-violent outcome of the Ukrainian crisis combined with a reduction of the European dependence on Russian energy are the West's ideal strategy, though it is an ambitious one that requires heaps of political leadership and cooperation between Western states.  In the long term, a Russian liberal democracy is the best bid for a safe Eastern Europe.



References
Aiyar, Shekhar et al. 2013.  Growth Slowdowns and the Middle-Income Trap.  IMF working paper.  Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2013/wp1371.pdf on 2013-08-28.

CNN.  Kerry on Ukraine: Solution is tough, but situation better than yesterday.  Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/05/world/europe/ukraine-russia-tensions/ on 2014-04-20

Eichengreen, Barry et al. 2013.  Growth Slowdowns Redux: New Evidence on the Middle-Income Trap.  NBER Working Paper 18673.  Retrieved from www.nber.org/papers/w18673 on 2013-08-27.

Jesus Felipe.  Tracking the Middle-Income Trap: What is It, Who is in It, and Why? Asian Development Bank.  2012.   Retrieved from http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/2012/economics-wp-306.pdf and http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/2012/economics-wp-307.pdf on 2013-08-27

Freedom House.  Freedom in the world.  2012.  Available at http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2012/russia-0#.UujhTvk1jIV.  Consulted 2014-01-29. 

Daniel Kimmage.  Undermining Democracy: Russia – Selective Capitalism and Kleptocracy.  Freedom House.  2009.  Available at http://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/russia.pdf.  Consulted 2014-01-29. 

Juan J. Linz and Alfred Stepan.  Problems of democratic transition and consolidation.  1996.  Johns Hopkins University Press. 

The Observatory of Economic Complexity.  Country rankings (2008).  Available at http://atlas.media.mit.edu/rankings/.  Consulted 2014-01-29. 

Lilia Ovcharova.  Russia’s middle class: at the centre or on the periphery of Russian politics?  European Union’s Institute for Security Studies.  2012 February 16.  Available at http://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/detail/article/russias-middle-class-at-the-centre-or-on-the-periphery-of-russian-politics/.  Accessed 2014-01-29. 

Reuters.  Putin dissolves state news agency, tightens grip on Russia media.  Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/09/us-russia-media-idUSBRE9B80I120131209.  Consulted 2014-01-29. 

The Telegraph.  Russia look to control world's gas prices.  27 Dec 2008.  Available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/gas/3982543/Russia-look-to-control-worlds-gas-prices.html.  Accessed 2014-01-29.  

Trading Economics.  GINI index in Russia.  Available at http://www.tradingeconomics.com/russia/gini-index-wb-data.html.  Accessed 2014-04-20.

World Factbook.  Country comparison: Distribution of family income - GINI index.  Available at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2172rank.html.  Accessed 2014-04-20.  

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Ukraine: the story of an economic racket

Ukraine: the story of an economic racket

Ukraine is nowhere near bankrupt – the bankruptcy narrative misled its population and observers into an economic racket that steered the country away from the EU’s economic and political bloc and pushed it closer to Russia’s projected economic and political Eurasian Union.  Five pro-EU protesters were killed yesterday as the Yanukovich government adopted a tough stance on protesters, indicating a possible Ukrainian drift towards authoritarianism. 

Ukrainian bankruptcy – a myth
Ukraine has been said to be on the verge of bankruptcy and to have trouble refinancing its external debt.  Although it indeed has trouble with the second for motives of national politics, it is nowhere near bankrupt – its macroeconomic health indicators show a story similar to many other Post-Soviet countries, with its national debt being 37% of GDP and comparing advantageously to an EU average of 85% for 2012[1].  What is at the center of Ukraine’s perceived insolvency is the refusal of the IMF to finance its foreign for one important yet little-known reason: the cut of gas subsidies to Ukrainian households, a USSR legacy[2].  The Ukrainian government cripples its macroeconomic situation in two ways: it spends a hefty sum of money in gas subsidies, effectively raising gas consumption above market levels, consequently subsidizing Russian Gazprom’s gas exports to Ukraine; heavy gas consumption artificially raises the need for foreign currencies above the natural level, stimulating a trade deficit. 

In the current situation, an IMF loan to Ukraine would see some of its funds transformed as a subsidy to Russian Gazprom, which could hardly be acceptable to Western lenders.  However, a slashing of subsidies would be extremely unpopular among Ukrainians.  

The EU accession agreement theater
The Yanukovich government, who refused to cut household heating subsidies on gas in order to obtain a loan from the IMF to refinance its external debt, invoked a narrative of imminent bankruptcy to demand 20B euros of financial support from its neighbours in return for the signing of the accession treaty[3].  The EU, pressured in handing out a hefty sum of money to sign an accession treaty with Ukraine that would bring Ukraine firmly Western influence, refused to give in to Yanukovich’s extortion.  

At that time, the IMF had already engaged in a dialogue with Ukrainian authorities about its external debt and published a statement on October 31 2013 detailing the problems affecting Ukraine.  Given that nothing had been done to remedy these problems, the Yanukovych government knew very well that the EU would refuse to be extorted.  It was then safe for the pro-Russian Ukrainian government to create this external debt crisis and then feign surprise at the European refusal.  It then shouted its distress out to the world and carried this theatre to its logical ending: a Russian rescue. 

Economic racketeering
It could be argued that the Ukrainian government’s position on this issue was a miscalculation, a fluke.  However, Nicu Popescu from the European Union Institute for Security Studies reported that the Russian strategy  “[...] would also be complemented with carrots, with the strategy speaking of the need to provide more opportunities for business groups that take heed of the Russian message and start working against the Association Agreement, and the need to incentivise Yanukovich’s family and inner circle by offering them specific money-making opportunities on the Russian market.”[4] 

Either the Yanukovich government is extremely amateurish and failed to appreciate the thought that Ukraine couldn’t extort its way into the EU or it just plain sold its country to foreign interests.  Either way, economic racketeering itself should wash away any legitimacy the Yanukovich government has to rule Ukraine - and that is not even considering the violent repression of its population or the 2004 Orange Revolution triggered by massive election fraud in favour of current-president Yanukovich. 





Details and data
Reasons for the IMF to assess Ukraine’s macroeconomic environment negatively: “The mission and the authorities consider that a set of comprehensive and credible reforms is needed to address vulnerabilities and revive growth. The mission recommends that the reform agenda include: (i) increased exchange rate flexibility combined with policies to strengthen the financial sector; (ii) ambitious fiscal consolidation; (iii) increases in domestic energy tariffs, and (iv) comprehensive structural reforms to improve the business climate and support growth.” 
International Monetary Fund.  Statement by IMF Mission to Ukraine.  Press Release No. 13/419

The IMF’s assessment of gas subsidies: “The large loss-making energy sector needs to be reformed. The low retail tariffs (covering only a small fraction of economic costs) generate quasi-fiscal losses, balance of payment weaknesses, underinvestment in domestic production, and governance problems. As a priority measure, we advise a significant upfront increase in gas and heating tariffs for households and adoption of a schedule for further increases until cost recovery is reached. To mitigate the effect of tariff adjustment on the less affluent, we recommend scaling up targeted social assistance programs that would cover up to 40 percent of the population.”
International Monetary Fund.  Statement by IMF Mission to Ukraine.  Press Release No. 13/419


Details on Ukraine’s demand of 20B euros in exchange of signing the accession agreement: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/ukraine-asks-eu-for-20bn-in-return-for-signing-association-agreement-8998714.html

Articles and press releases
Popescu, Nicu.  The Russia-Ukraine trade spat.  European Institute for Security Issues.  Alerts - No26 - 30 August 2013.  http://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/detail/article/the-russia-ukraine-trade-spat/

International Monetary Fund.  Statement by IMF Mission to Ukraine.  Press Release No. 13/419

Macroeconomic data
World Economic Outlook Database, October 2013 Edition.  http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/weodata/index.aspx.  Data used for this article are series General government gross debt and General government primary net lending/borrowing


2012 data
Debt as % of GDP
Government Fiscal Balance (% of GDP)
Armenia
38.91
-0.592
Belarus
41.87
1.981
Kazakhstan
12.45
3.883
Poland
55.59
-1.09
Russia
12.45
0.805
Uzbekistan
8.64
8.558
Ukraine
37.42
-2.55

Eurostat.  gov_dd_edpt1 series; INDIC_NA = Government Consolidated Gross Debt.   http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database






[1] Eurostat.  gov_dd_edpt1 series; INDIC_NA = Government Consolidated Gross Debt.   http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database
World Economic Outlook Database, October 2013 Edition.  http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/weodata/index.aspx.  Data used for this article are series General government gross debt and General government primary net lending/borrowing
[4] Popescu, Nicu.  The Russia-Ukraine trade spat.  European Institute for Security Issues.  Alerts - No26 - 30 August 2013.  http://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/detail/article/the-russia-ukraine-trade-spat/